Comparing the Google Pixel Fold to the Xiaomi Redmi Note is fundamentally a form-factor question. Foldables carry a steep price premium over even the best traditional flagships — this comparison only makes sense if you are genuinely drawn to the large folding-screen experience, not just looking for a better phone.
Early in release cycle
Early in release cycle
Early in cycle - good trade-in value expected
Early in cycle - good trade-in value expected
A new Google Pixel Fold model has been announced, which makes this an unusual moment to choose between the two. Buying the current Google Pixel Fold right now means accepting soon-to-be-outdated hardware, so unless you find a significant deal, the Xiaomi Redmi Note is the safer purchase this month.
Neither series is in a notable deals window right now. Prices are close to standard retail. If you are flexible on timing, waiting for a seasonal sale event (Black Friday, Prime Day) could net meaningful savings.
The Google Pixel Fold is for the tech-forward professional who wants a single device that replaces both their phone and tablet. It is perfect for users already deep in Google's ecosystem — Gmail, Drive, Docs, Meet — who want the productivity of a larger screen in their pocket. If you value clean Android software, the best-in-class Pixel camera system, and 7 years of guaranteed updates in a foldable form factor, the Pixel Fold is the most thoughtfully designed Google device ever made.
The Redmi Note series is for the budget-conscious buyer who refuses to compromise on features. It's the perfect choice for users who want a large, beautiful display, a versatile camera that's great for social media, and a battery that lasts all day and then some. If you want the most features for your money and love tweaking your phone's settings, the Redmi Note is hard to beat.
On pure timing alone, the Xiaomi Redmi Note is the stronger buy right now. That said, the right choice ultimately depends on your ecosystem, budget, and how you use your phone day-to-day.
Not sure how we calculate these ratings? Read our methodology →