If you are weighing the Nothing Phone against the Samsung Galaxy Z, you are comparing two very different value propositions. Each series represents a distinct philosophy: Nothing Phone appeals to a specific type of Android user, while Samsung Galaxy Z targets a different set of priorities. Below we break down what matters most.
Imminent new model release
Early in release cycle
Clearance discounts before new model release
Early in cycle - good trade-in value expected
From a timing standpoint, the Samsung Galaxy Z is earlier in its release cycle, giving you a longer window before you need to think about a successor. The Nothing Phone is deeper into its cycle, so a new model could be closer than you think.
Current deals favor the Nothing Phone, which is in an active discount window. If price is a major factor, now is a particularly good time to pull the trigger on it.
The Nothing Phone series is for the user who is tired of boring smartphone designs and wants something that genuinely stands out. It is perfect for design-conscious buyers, tech enthusiasts, and anyone who values a clean, bloatware-free Android experience similar to stock Android but with unique personality. If you want a phone that sparks conversation, delivers reliable daily performance, and comes from a brand with a bold vision for the future of tech, Nothing is for you.
The Samsung Galaxy Z series is for users who want to genuinely reimagine what a smartphone can be. The Z Flip7 appeals to style-conscious users who want a compact, pocket-friendly phone that turns heads, while the Z Fold7 is built for productivity powerhouses who want a tablet in their pocket with S Pen support and Samsung DeX. Both are for early adopters who are comfortable with premium pricing and want to be at the leading edge of mobile technology.
Both series are evenly matched on timing right now. Your decision should come down to ecosystem preference, software update commitments, and which feature set matches your daily habits.
Not sure how we calculate these ratings? Read our methodology →